Manborg
(2011)
Director: Steven Kostanski
Cast: Matthew Kennedy, Adam Brooks, Meredith Sweeney
Ever since I can remember, I have loved movies. From the
first frame of Snow
White
that was projected on the silver screen when I went to a movie theater
for the first time, to decades later watching movies on my big screen
television at home, I have devoured the cinematic art form. That
probably explains best as to why I started this movie review web site.
Some of you may be wondering that since I love movies so much as to
constantly watch them and write reviews of them, have I ever had the
urge to get directly involved in the movie making process itself. I
must confess that that idea has crossed my mind a number of times.
Actually, more often in my youth than in this present day and age. You
see, I have loved movies enough to have read countless books and
articles about them, and what I have learned about how movies get made
has made the creation process look very unappealing. Mainly it's with
the Hollywood film business. Strict creative control by a filmmaker in
Hollywood is very rare - filmmakers more often than not have to
collaborate with many other people on the same movie, and in that
process someone's strong and clear vision more often than not gets
diluted. There is the saying that, "Too many cooks spoil the broth,"
and with so many voices speaking up on the same film explains why the
majority of Hollywood movies are pretty bad. And don't get me started
on the Canadian film industry, which not only more often than not
suckles on the taxpayers' teat, is more often forced (or heavily
pressured to) to make movies that have little to no commercial
potential. Though I have an artistic vision, I would also want people
to be attracted to watching my movies, and there's little room for such
filmmakers in the Great White North.
As you can see, I would not want to make a film under
the thumb of some major movie production company, American or Canadian.
So it would seem that if I wanted badly enough to make my own movie, to
do what many filmmakers have done - make it completely under my control
on my own. While that may seem to be the logical thing to do, there are
some potential problems I have not figured out. For example, I don't
know how I would round up a cast of actors - especially talented
actors. Put an ad in my local newspaper? Then there are problems like
how I would round up a crew, especially since it wouldn't be a union
production. Then there would be the problem of getting equipment, from
lights to cameras, especially since the city I live in isn't exactly a
popular place to make movies. I guess those problems could be overcome
if one had the resources, but there is one essential resource that I am
short of - money. At least money to spare, since there is no way I
would tap into my retirement savings to make a movie, like what Troma
Films' Lloyd Kaufman did with one of his movies several years ago. I
don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars, and let's face it, so many
movies depend on an ample enough budget. On the other hand, I have
certainly heard of people making feature films on very low budgets. El Mariachi was
made for only $7000, and Paranormal Activity
was made for only $15000. Lloyd Kaufman once said something like, "If
you only have $5000, make a $5000 movie," and he certainly knows a lot
about low budget filmmaking.
So I guess it's possible that I could make my own movie
with very little money. Though I would take small steps to making my
own movie. I would first get a camera and editing software for my
computer, and figure out how to use both. Then I would start by making
a short film. Eventually I would make a feature length movie, though I
would probably first make a down to earth comedy or a serious domestic
drama, since those genres don't depend on large budgets. Certainly
there have been genre movies that have successfully been made on rock
bottom budgets like those two examples I mentioned in the previous
paragraph. Another such movie is Manborg.
I was interested in watching this movie, because it was an
independently made genre movie - the science fiction genre - on a real
rock bottom budget. The budget on this movie was only $1000 - and those
were Canadian
dollars. Yet
despite the ultra low budget, the end results were apparently
attractive enough to get the movie picked up by a fairly major American
DVD label. These facts got me so curious, I had to see how the
filmmakers accomplished so much with so little. The events of the movie
take place in the future, where "The Hell Wars" are raging all over the
world. An evil leader named Count Draculon (Brooks, Father's Day)
and his armies from Hell are determined to take over the world and wipe
out humanity, but humanity is fighting back. During one battle, a human
soldier (Kennedy, Father's
Day)
is killed. His body is taken by a scientist named Scorpius (also played
by Brooks) and is implanted with mechanical parts to make a cyborg,
which is given the name "Manborg". It is hoped by Doctor Scorpious that
Manborg will save the world, though he is soon captured
by Draculon's forces. In prison, he meets an Australian punk gunfighter
named Justice (Conor Sweeney, ABCs Of Death 2),
Justice's sister Mina (Meredith Sweeney, Father's Day),
as well as a kung fu master (Ludwig Lee). Eventually Manborg and his
three new friends escape, and are determined to stop Draculon. Despite
having all this help, Manborg is troubled by not knowing his origin,
and this weakness could lead to his possible downfall.
Regular readers of The Unknown Movies
will know that when I review a movie, I almost always judge it by
examining several main features of it. And as I type this, that is my
plan for my review of Manborg. But I
must admit that there was one thing about this particular movie I was
most interested in critiquing, and that was the look
of the movie. Probably that's what you are most interested in as well.
After all, the filmmakers only had $1000 to spend - could they create a
convincing science fiction world on a pittance of a budget? Well, my
opinion is that Manborg's
filmmakers created the best possible science fiction world anyone could
make for such a low budget. I say that because as much as they managed
to accomplish, the end results are (no surprise) not without fault. But
boy, what they did manage to do. The wardrobe department managed to
dress every actor in appropriate clothing, from soldiers in the field
battling the armies of Hell to Doctor Scorpius in classic scientist
whites. When it comes to the various props showcased, from hover
vehicles to weapons, the results are also very impressive. Yes, for the
most part they have a crude and clunky feeling to them, but it feels
right for the war-ravaged world the events of the movie are taking
place in. Speaking of that war-ravaged world, the various sets
constructed also are more often than not a marvel for the eye.
According to what I uncovered while doing research on the movie, the
sets were miniatures constructed out of boxes and various odds and
ends. Then apparently the actors were filmed for the most part in a
garage and through chroma key technology their footage was combined
with photography of the miniature sets.
I feel that I should make clear that the costumes,
props, and sets are not up to big budget Hollywood movies. So is the
cinematography, since the bulk of the footage shot was apparently given
a soft focus look somewhere down the line, possibly to help mask the
cheaply made effects. But when you remind yourself of the $1000 budget,
you can't help but be impressed with what was wrangled or built for the
movie. That also includes the various special effects - there's a lot
more than you may think. There are tons of them, from little details
like explosions in the background as humanity battles the forces of
Hell to full blown special effects such as stop-motion animated
monsters battling the protagonists in gladiator combat. While I am
speaking of scenes of action, I think it's a good time to mention
something that director Kostanski apparently couldn't do with his low
budget, and that is to generate much excitement with the action scenes.
Possibly because most of the movie was filmed in a garage, most of the
action feels confined and lacking a "big" feel to it. Some other action
sequences (like the battlefield sequence at the start of the movie) are
awkwardly presented, making it hard to figure out at times what exactly
is happening. And even though one of the characters in the movie is a
kung fu master, the scenes of martial arts are not choreographed or
edited that well. Still, despite the action not being that terribly
hot, there is usually some interesting factor to make these scenes
interesting to watch. For example, when Manborg or one of his friends
is battling a stop-motion animated monster, there is a slightly goofy
feeling that makes you smile a little at the silly sight of it all.
That fact that I mentioned at the end of the previous
paragraph should give you a clue as to another reason why Manborg
is fun to watch - it doesn't take itself completely seriously. There
are a few moments that are clearly designed to make the audience laugh
out loud, like when Manborg is handed a "future cassette" by his
creator, or the fact that actor Ludwig Lee as the kung fu master is
clearly dubbed by another actor throughout. However, the member of the
cast who steals the show is Connor Sweeney as Justice, the Australian
punk. He accomplishes the difficult task of being not just amusingly
goofy, but goofy in a way that is believable. He seems to realize that
going over the top would not fit with the mostly straight faced
attitude of his surroundings. In my opinion, that mostly serious
attitude was the right decision by the filmmakers. Deliberate camp is
something that is very difficult to pull off successfully, and being
constantly jokey would not only have been very annoying, it would have
suggested to the audience that the filmmakers not only had contempt for
their creation, but towards the audience as well. Ironically, with the
movie being played mostly straight, it is easier to smile and laugh at
what you are seeing. Eventually the joke becomes somewhat repetitive
and wears a little thin, but the filmmakers seemed to have realized
that, since around that time the movie finishes (if you don't count the
end credits) exactly at the one hour mark. This speeding through the
movie, though a wise decision overall, does lead to some problems like
the majority of the characters being weakly written (Manborg is
surprisingly a secondary character for much of the running time, and
the movie's chief villain, Count Draculon, only shows up for a few
minutes in total.) But when I sit down to watch a movie with such a low
budget as this, I prepare myself for finding some inevitable
shortcomings and I lower my usual expectations, which helps towards
possibly finding the movie enjoyable in the end. If you have that
ability, chances are you'll find Manborg a silly
but enjoyable backyard production.
(Posted August 12, 2016)
Check for availability on Amazon (DVD)
-
-
Check
for availability on Amazon (Amazon Prime Video)
See also: Cherry 2000, Invader, Omega Doom
|