Mixed Company
(1974)
Director: Melville Shavelson
Cast: Joseph Bologna, Barbara Harris, Tom Bosley
With most
married couples, there are a few important decisions both parties have
to decide on before they reach the altar. One of those important
decisions is whether or not they should have children, with the
follow-up question to that being that if they do decide on children,
how many should they have. There is also the question as to whether
they want to have children the traditional way, or get children another
way. Certainly, there are advantages of having children the traditional
way, the biggest being that it's sure a lot of fun making your own
babies, if you know what I mean. But for some couples, having children
the traditional way may not be an option, a lot of times being that for
medical reasons they can't make their own babies. What then can they
do? Well, as I suggested earlier, there are other ways of getting
children, one of them being the process of adoption. Certainly,
adoption has some serious advantages that you can't have when making
your own babies. You can choose the sex of the child you want, for
example. And if you don't want to go through the process of dirty
diapers and the Terrible Twos, you can adopt a child who is several
years old. But there are problems with the adoption process, at least
with the one I have observed in my own country as well as the one you
find in the United States. I personally know a couple who were
seriously considering adoption, going as far as getting a social worker
who would help them with the process. But when they saw that the
process would take a number of years, cost a considerable amount of
money, and involve a bunch of complicated work, they ultimately changed
their minds.
I certainly don't blame that couple for changing their
minds about going through the domestic adoption process. The government
of my country at one point did execute a campaign trying to convince my
fellow citizens to adopt the thousands of children in the country who
were without a parent, though it was short-lived. One of the reasons
that they started the campaign was that many of the people in my
country who were interested in adopting a child were finding that it
was much easier to go to another country and adopt a foreign child.
There is much less red tape, and there is often a lot less expense
involved. While there are definitely advantages of adopting a child
from a foreign culture, there are also some potential problems that can
come up. The child may be from another race, and when he or she starts
to get older, the child may start to feel that he doesn't belong in the
family - or the family's culture - because he or she looks different.
But I do know personally that adopting a child from a foreign culture
can be done well enough so that both the child and the adoptive family
can benefit. One of my best friends here in town has an older brother
who was adopted from Korea when he was just an infant. He grew up well
loved and supported, and didn't seem to have any personal problem
growing up, nor did he have any brushes with the law (well, except for
the time he made a pair of nunchucks and took them to school.) Today,
he is employed in a steady job, has his own home, and is happily
married to a lovely woman. I've talked to him several times, and he is
a very nice guy with a good sense of humor.
So as I said, it's possible to adopt children from
another culture, and both the adoptive parents and the adopted child
have no problems and in fact benefit from the relationship. Of course,
when it comes to the subject of adoption in the world of motion
pictures, filmmakers don't seem very interested in portraying
adoption
(domestic or foreign) as being trouble-free, probably because that
route would not offer very much drama or conflict to an audience. When
filmmakers do tackle adoption, they seem to go towards one of two
extremes. The first path is one with a lot of drama and angst, with
both the child and the adoptive parents involved in serious struggle.
The second path is comic in nature, with all sorts of wacky things
happening, like with the Problem Child
movies. That is the path that Mixed Company
follows. This comic path wasn't what attracted me to the movie, but
instead the fact that this 1970s adoption movie was one of the first to
be strongly focused on the subject of adopting children from different
cultures. I was curious to see what the viewpoint on the subject was
more than forty years ago, and if things had changed for the better (or
worse) since then. The central characters of the movie are a married
couple, Pete (Bologna, Cops & Robbers) and Kathy
(Harris, Nashville),
who presently have three children. Kathy wants a fourth child, but
their doctor has told the couple they are unable to have any more
children. At least the traditional way, that is. At her job at a foster
home, Kathy soon after gets the idea of adopting a child. But since she
finds there are precious few Caucasian children available to be
adopted, she finds her choices are pretty much limited to children of
minority races. Kathy does not mind this at all, and she arranges to
take home an African-American child by the name of Freddie (Haywood
Nelson, What's Happening!)
for a trial period. This horrifies Pete, because he is a very
bigoted person. But Pete's objections do not sway Kathy's mind. In
fact, a short time later, she not only brings home a Vietnamese child
(Jina Tan), but also a Native American child (Stephen Honanie). As you
can imagine, Pete is even more upset, and not only has to tolerate
these children for his wife's sake, he has to deal with the upset
racist Caucasians who live in his area, like his next door neighbor Al
(Bosley, The Bang Bang Kid).
I like to think that while present-day society still has
a way to go, we have made over the past few decades significant
progress with various attitudes, such as with race relations. So I had
an idea that Mixed Company,
being more than forty years old, might have some attitudes that seen
today might seem out of date, even if they were done with the best of
intentions at the time. My first clue was looking at the theatrical
poster for the movie, which was printed on the front of the movie's DVD
case. On the poster, one of the biological children of the Harris and
Bologna characters says upon news of his new ethnic adopted siblings,
"At
last I can learn how to hot-wire a car!" (Yeah, Native Americans sure
are notorious car thieves, right?) If you think that is bad, consider
what's to be found in the movie itself. When Freddie first comes to his
new home, multiple members of the (white) neighborhood stare frozen in
shock at the sight of this African-American child. (Two hours later,
the neighbors come to Pete and Kathy with an offer to buy their house.)
Freddie's teacher at school feels so sorry for him that she doesn't
assign him homework like with her other students. Later, Kathy,
pleading with her husband to accept Freddie, asks him, "How many black
families can afford to adopt?" Kathy's biological children react to
their new adopted siblings in ways ranging from the youngest (Ariane
Heller) refusing to take a bite out of Freddie's hot dog to the middle
child (Eric Olson, Viva
Knievel!)
saying, "Well, there goes the neighborhood" at the sight of Freddie
moving in. Later in the movie, Pete's confrontation with members of the
police over Freddie has the police telling Pete that not only is his
adopting of Freddie "a long shot", but also asking him, "What will you
do when he grows up and gets a white girl pregnant?"
Though racism certainly is still around more than forty
years later, I don't think I have to tell you today a lot of what I
described in the previous paragraph is mighty uncomfortable and
unbelievable today. But most of the cringe-worthy moments come from
Bologna's character Pete. When Freddie first comes to his house, Pete
says to his wife, "Did you notice that he's a sp**e?" Later, he calls
Freddie "Superfly" to his face, as well as explaining the presence of
Freddie to a pal by saying "He's my uncle doing a Al Jolson imitation."
And that's just some of the milder reactions he has towards ethnic
people, not just limited to the three children his wife wants to adopt.
Quite frankly, the character of Pete is one of the most distasteful
characters I have seen in a movie for quite some time, not just with
his blatant bigotry, but the fact that in just about every scene he
comes across as unbelievably hostile, even to his wife and three
biological children. I think the intention of writer/director Melville
Shavelson (Yours,
Mine And Ours)
was to make Pete another Archie Bunker. But if you remember Archie
Bunker, care was made by the show's creators and actor Carroll O'Connor
to give Bunker a vulnerable and ignorant edge so that he'd remain
palatable. Pete,
on the other hand, is pretty much pure hatred for most of the running
time. He is always lashing out, not just to the members of the
basketball team he coaches (he calls one player a "jolly black giant"),
but even towards his wife and biological children. He is such an ugly
character, that not only will viewers be more wishing that he ends up
in a really undesirable fate than to change his perspective, that when
his character does start to
come around in the last part of the movie, the transformation is so
sudden and large that it goes beyond straining credibility.
As it turns out, none of the other principle characters
(and the actors who play them) manage to win over the audience. Harris'
character never really explains why she wants more children, for one
thing, and it doesn't take long for the character to be shoved into the
background and remain there for most of the rest of the movie. There
isn't that much to be said about the kids in the movie as well; the
character of Freddie has too much attitude to be sympathetic, and while
there is initially some promise with the family's progressive-thinking
oldest biological daughter (Lisa Gerritsen, Airport),
the character is ultimately shoved into the background as well. With
all these sour characters and the often uncomfortable racial attitude,
it should come as no surprise that Mixed Company
also fails at its main ambition to be a family-friendly comedy-drama
the whole family will enjoy. It's simply not appropriate for kids, not
just for the reasons already mentioned, but for the fact there is so
much profanity (and an eyebrow-raising amount of nudity, both child and
adult) that the movie would easily
get slapped with a PG-13 (or higher) rating if submitted to the MPAA
today. As for
adult viewers, there certainly isn't that much to laugh about when the
movie tries to be funny. The general tone of the movie is so sour, so
hostile, that potentially funny scenes and one-liners simply can't
induce the audience to let their guard down and laugh even a little.
The more serious moments in the movie that could have had some serious
dramatic impact also come across as equally painful to view because
they are so cold and heavy-handed that viewers will just feel sad and
depressed. Well before the end of the movie, I saw all too well that
there was an old proverb that, slightly rewritten, was very apt: Misery
loves mixed company.
(Posted June 28, 2021)
Check for availability on Amazon (DVD)
-
-
Check
for availability on Amazon (Amazon Prime Video)
See also: Earthbound, Kenny & Company, No
Dessert Dad...
|